IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Main Archive Directory]
- Oct 01 2008
- RE: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, TJ
- RE: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, TJ
- Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Tim Chown
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
- Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe, Jeroen Massar
- Re: the IPv6 Ethernet lost bits - fffe (was: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?), Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, TJ
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Mohacsi Janos
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, michael.dillon
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, michael.dillon
- Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?, Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Sep 30 2008
Mail converted by MHonArc