IP Version 6 Working Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Oct 24 2010

Re: ipv4 and ipv6 a different protocol, Turchanyi Geza

Oct 23 2010

Re: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-6man-header-reserved-bits-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-6man-header-reserved-bits-00.txt, Fred Baker
Re: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-6man-header-reserved-bits-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
ipv4 and ipv6 a different protocol, Mahesh Govindappa
Question on IPV6 RFC 2460 Section 4.2, myhaso . groups
I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-6man-header-reserved-bits-00.txt, Randy Bush
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Philip Homburg
Question on IPV6 RFC 2460 Section 4.2, Mahesh Govindappa
Question on IPV6 RFC 2460 Section 4.2, Mahesh Govindappa

Oct 22 2010

I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-6man-header-reserved-bits-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Ed Jankiewicz
RE: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Laganier, Julien
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Philip Homburg
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Bob Hinden
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Philip Homburg
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Philip Homburg
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Philip Homburg
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Randy Bush
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Behcet Sarikaya

Oct 21 2010

Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Behcet Sarikaya
Re: Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Bob Hinden
Consensus call on adopting <draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-08.txt>, Bob Hinden
Re: [Softwires] TR: I-D Action:draft-lee-6man-ra-dslite-00.txt, Wojciech Dec
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Lee, Yiu

Oct 20 2010

Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), james woodyatt
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Thomas Narten
Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Sam Silvester
RE: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Frank Bulk

Oct 19 2010

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Mark Smith
Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter
RE: [v6ops]Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, STARK, BARBARA H (ATTLABS)
RE: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Steve.Dotson
RE: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Ronald Bonica
Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Gert Doering
Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Fred Baker
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), james woodyatt

Oct 15 2010

I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Brian Haberman

Oct 15 2010

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [v6ops] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-15.txt, David Conrad
Re: [Fwd: RFC 5292 Comment], Test
Re: I-D Action:draft-fujisaki-6man-addr-select-opt-00.txt, Arifumi Matsumoto
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-01.txt, Arifumi Matsumoto
I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: I-D Action:draft-fujisaki-6man-addr-select-opt-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter

Oct 14 2010

[Fwd: Re: Further Comment to RFC 5952], Seiichi Kawamura
[Fwd: RFC 5292 Comment], Seiichi Kawamura
RE: draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Skinner, Stephen \(Accenture Network Services\)
draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Alain Durand
RE: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Hemant Singh (shemant)
RE: [Softwires] TR: I-D Action:draft-lee-6man-ra-dslite-00.txt, Maglione Roberta
RE: [Softwires] TR: I-D Action:draft-lee-6man-ra-dslite-00.txt, mohamed.boucadair
Some questions about RFC 5572 (Tunnel Setup Protocol), Fernando Gont
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Jake Khuon

Oct 13 2010

RE: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Olivier Vautrin

Oct 12 2010

Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Chris White
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Ed Jankiewicz
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Seiichi Kawamura

Oct 11 2010

Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Hing-Kam (Kam) Lam
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-flow-ecmp-03.txt], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Matsuzaki Yoshinobu
RE: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, George, Wes E IV [NTK]
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Jason.Weil
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Rémi Després
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-flow-ecmp-03.txt], Brian Haberman
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Satoru Matsushima
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Aleksi Suhonen
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Tina TSOU
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Erik Muller

Oct 10 2010

Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, brad dreisbach
RE: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Senad Palislamovic
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Christopher Morrow

Oct 09 2010

Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Randy Bush
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, carlos watson
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, sthaug
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Tore Anderson
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Shane Amante
Re: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Jared Mauch
RE: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt, Brian Haberman

Oct 07 2010

RE: [Softwires] TR: I-D Action:draft-lee-6man-ra-dslite-00.txt, Maglione Roberta
[Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-flow-ecmp-03.txt], Brian E Carpenter

Oct 06 2010

Proliferation of ways to do things, Ben Jencks

Oct 05 2010

Re: Question for Flow Label, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Question for Flow Label, Thomas Narten

Oct 02 2010

Re: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Bob Hinden
Re: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Carsten Bormann
Re: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Fernando Gont
Re: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Randy Bush
Re: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Fernando Gont
Re: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Bob Hinden

Oct 01 2010

Re: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Ana Kukec
RE: IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Laganier, Julien
Re: Question for Flow Label, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Question for Flow Label, Rémi Després
IPRs on SEND/CGAs?, Fernando Gont
Re: Question for Flow Label, Yiu L. Lee
Re: Question for Flow Label, Yiu L. Lee
Re: Question for Flow Label, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Question for Flow Label, Rémi Després
[Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hu-flow-label-cases-02.txt], Brian E Carpenter

Sep 30 2010

Re: Question for Flow Label, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Question for Flow Label, Yiu L. Lee
Re: Question for Flow Label, Rémi Després

Sep 29 2010

Re: Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Rémi Després

Sep 28 2010

Re: Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Suresh Krishnan
Re: Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Hing-Kam (Kam) Lam
TR: I-D Action:draft-lee-6man-ra-dslite-00.txt, mohamed.boucadair

Sep 27 2010

RE: Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
Re: Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Suresh Krishnan
RE: Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
Re: Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Suresh Krishnan

Sep 26 2010

Re: New version available, Behcet Sarikaya
RE: Question for Flow Label, Manfredi, Albert E

Sep 25 2010

Re: Question for Flow Label, Brian E Carpenter
Review of draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr-08, Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
Re: Question for Flow Label, Yiu L. Lee
Re: Question for Flow Label, Joel M. Halpern
Question for Flow Label, Yiu L. Lee

Sep 24 2010

Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Rémi Després
RE: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)

Sep 23 2010

Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Brandon Butterworth
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Philip Homburg
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Philip Homburg
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mark Smith
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mark Smith
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Sander Steffann
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mark Smith
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mark Smith
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Philip Homburg
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Arnaud Ebalard
Re: New version available, Benny Amorsen
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson

Sep 22 2010

Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mark Smith
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mark Smith
Re: New version available, Benny Amorsen
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Alexandru Petrescu
Re: New version available, Alexandru Petrescu
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Alexandru Petrescu
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Francis Dupont
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Francis Dupont
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Arnaud Ebalard
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mohacsi Janos
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Christopher Morrow
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Karl Auer
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Randy Bush
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Arnaud Ebalard
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Randy Bush
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mark Smith
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Hesham Soliman
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Rémi Després
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Rémi Després
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Hesham Soliman
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Hesham Soliman
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Hesham Soliman
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Hesham Soliman
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Mark Smith
Re: New version available, Hesham Soliman
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Doug Barton
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Brian E Carpenter
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again, Doug Barton
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Karl Auer
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Randy Bush
RE: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Christian Huitema

Sep 21 2010

Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Randy Bush
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Carsten Bormann
Re: New version available, Rémi Després
RE: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
RE: New version available, Manfredi, Albert E
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Rémi Després
RE: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: New version available, Randy Bush
RE: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: New version available, Rémi Després
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Michael Richardson
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Hesham Soliman
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Rémi Després
RE: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Hesham Soliman
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Ole Troan
Re: DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Mikael Abrahamsson
DHCPv6 vs ND strikes again (was: New version available), Ole Troan
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson

Sep 20 2010

Re: New version available, Brian E Carpenter
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Brian E Carpenter

Sep 18 2010

Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Carsten Bormann

Sep 18 2010

Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Rémi Després
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, JP Vasseur
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Fernando Gont
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Fernando Gont

Sep 17 2010

Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Erik Nordmark
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Rémi Després
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Fernando Gont
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Carsten Bormann
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Shane Amante
Fwd: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations, Brian Haberman
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Brian E Carpenter
Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Dale W. Carder
[Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-04.txt], Brian E Carpenter

Sep 16 2010

RE: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Erik Nordmark
RE: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)

Sep 15 2010

Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, JP Vasseur
Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model, Tom Taylor
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Carsten Bormann
Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model, sthaug
Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model, Erik Nordmark
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Fred Baker
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Rémi Després
Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model, sthaug
Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model, Ole Troan
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Carsten Bormann
Re: [Roll] Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable, Erik Nordmark
RE: Call for agenda items, Sheng Jiang
SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model, Erik Nordmark
Re: AW: New version available, John Jason Brzozowski

Sep 14 2010

Re: Call for agenda items, Fernando Gont
Call for agenda items, Brian Haberman
Re: AW: New version available, Randy Bush
Re: AW: New version available, Suresh Krishnan
Re: AW: New version available, John Jason Brzozowski
RE: AW: New version available, Jason.Weil
Re: AW: New version available, John Jason Brzozowski
Re: AW: AW: New version available, Ole Troan
RE: AW: New version available, Jason.Weil
Re: AW: New version available, Ole Troan
Re: AW: AW: New version available, Suresh Krishnan
Re: AW: New version available, Suresh Krishnan
Re: exposing allocation policy externally, Jeroen Massar
Re: exposing allocation policy externally, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: exposing allocation policy externally, bill manning
Re: exposing allocation policy externally, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: exposing allocation policy externally, Jeroen Massar
exposing allocation policy externally, Mikael Abrahamsson

Sep 13 2010

I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
AW: New version available, Olaf.Bonness
Re: AW: AW: New version available, Ole Troan
Re: New version available, Wojciech Dec
AW: AW: New version available, Olaf.Bonness
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Rémi Després
Re: AW: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: AW: New version available, Ole Troan
AW: New version available, Olaf.Bonness
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Fred Baker

Sep 12 2010

Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: SLAAC or not, Mark Smith
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mark Smith
Re: SLAAC or not, sthaug
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mark Smith
Re: SLAAC or not, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: SLAAC or not, Brian E Carpenter
Re: SLAAC or not, sthaug

Sep 11 2010

Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mark Smith
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Rémi Després
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Rémi Després
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Jari Arkko
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Fred Baker
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Fred Baker
Re: New version available, Randy Bush
Re: New version available, Fred Baker
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Brian E Carpenter
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mark Smith

Sep 10 2010

RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Laganier, Julien
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Brian E Carpenter
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Doug Barton
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Fernando Gont
Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-teredo-loops-00], Fernando Gont
Re: New version available, Doug Barton
Re: New version available, t.petch
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Rémi Després
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Ralph Droms
Re: New version available, Wojciech Dec
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Mikael Abrahamsson
RE: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Jari Arkko
AW: New version available, Olaf.Bonness
Re: New version available, sthaug
RE: New version available, Maglione Roberta
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
RE: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Tina TSOU
RE: New version available, Maglione Roberta
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Rémi Després
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Rémi Després
Re: New version available, sthaug
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Fred Baker

Sep 09 2010

Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Fernando Gont
Re: New version available, Mark Smith
SLAAC or not [Re: New version available], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Fernando Gont
RE: New version available, Laganier, Julien
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Shane Amante
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Shane Amante
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Fernando Gont
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Fernando Gont
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Christopher Morrow
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Rémi Després
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Protocol Action: 'IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Shane Amante
Re: New version available, Christopher Morrow
Re: New version available, Mark Smith
Re: New version available, sthaug
Re: New version available, Fred Baker
RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Alan Kavanagh
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Fred Baker
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Rémi Després
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Revising Flow-Labels of RFC-3697 - A possible direction?, Rémi Després
RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), JOSHI, SHRINIVAS ASHOK (SHRINIVAS ASHOK)
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Tim Chown
Re: New version available, Fred Baker
RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), JOSHI, SHRINIVAS ASHOK (SHRINIVAS ASHOK)
Re: New version available, Mark Smith
RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), JOSHI, SHRINIVAS ASHOK (SHRINIVAS ASHOK)
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: New version available, Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Steven Blake
Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-teredo-loops-00], Rémi Denis-Courmont
XP, IPv6 and DNS (was Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt)), Karl Auer

Sep 08 2010

RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Laganier, Julien
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fred Baker
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Fernando Gont
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Shane Amante
Re: New version available, Brian E Carpenter
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Mark Smith
RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus callon adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Manfredi, Albert E
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Wojciech Dec
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: New version available, sthaug
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: New version available, Doug Barton
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Ralph Droms
Re: New version available, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Thomas Narten
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Fernando Gont
Re: New version available, sthaug
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Doug Barton
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Thomas Narten
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Joel M. Halpern
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fernando Gont
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Doug Barton
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Shane Amante
I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
RE: Flow label (im)mutability, George, Wes E [NTK]
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Shane Amante
RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Laganier, Julien
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Ralph Droms
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Steven Blake
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Christopher Morrow
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Rémi Després
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Christopher Morrow
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Christopher Morrow
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Mark Smith
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Rémi Després
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Rémi Després
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fred Baker
[Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-teredo-loops-00], Fernando Gont
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Doug Barton
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Fernando Gont
Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Fernando Gont
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Christopher Morrow
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Christopher Morrow
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fred Baker
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Fred Baker
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Christopher Morrow
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Joel M. Halpern
Re: Flow label (im)mutability, Joel M. Halpern
Flow label (im)mutability, Brian E Carpenter

Sep 07 2010

Re: Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Steven Blake
Question on draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security-00, Shane Amante
RE: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), JOSHI, SHRINIVAS ASHOK (SHRINIVAS ASHOK)

Sep 02 2010

RE: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Laganier, Julien

Aug 31 2010

RE: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Olivier Vautrin
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Fernando Gont

Aug 29 2010

Moving the Endpoint Identifier (EID) Option to Obsolete, Fernando Gont
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Mark Smith
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Christopher Morrow
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Mark Smith
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Christopher Morrow

Aug 28 2010

Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Mark Smith
Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Mark Smith
Some IPv6 node req bis observations, teemu.savolainen
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan

Aug 27 2010

Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Thomas Narten
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: Router redirects in Node Requirements document, Jared Mauch
RE: Router redirects in Node Requirements document, Hemant Singh (shemant)
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Ralph Droms
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Ralph Droms
Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Pekka Savola
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Thomas Narten
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Ralph Droms

Aug 26 2010

Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Brian E Carpenter
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Thomas Narten
Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Brian Haberman
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Thomas Narten
RE: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Alan Kavanagh
Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Thomas Narten
Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Brian Haberman
RE: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Alan Kavanagh
Re: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Thomas Narten
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Thomas Narten
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Wojciech Dec
Re: Router redirects in Node Requirements document, Pekka Savola
Re: Router redirects in Node Requirements document, Randy Bush
Re: Router redirects in Node Requirements document, Alain Durand
Supportive of moving Draft Krsihnan forward, Bill Welch
Re: Router redirects in Node Requirements document, Christopher Morrow
RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Manfredi, Albert E

Aug 25 2010

RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Hemant Singh (shemant)
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Hemant Singh (shemant)
RE: 6man discussion on /127 document @ IETF78, Hemant Singh (shemant)
RE: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Manfredi, Albert E
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Wojciech Dec
Re: RS Lost failure scenario (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Suresh Krishnan
RE: Node Requirements: Updated IPsec/IKEv2 text, Frankel, Sheila E.
Re: Node Requirements: Updated IPsec/IKEv2 text, Fernando Gont
Node Requirements: Updated IPsec/IKEv2 text, Thomas Narten
Re: New version available (Was Re: Consensus call on adopting:draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt), Thomas Narten
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Mark Smith
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Mark Smith
Re: ping-pong phenomenon with p2p links & /127 prefixes, Mark Smith

Mail converted by MHonArc