Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling



On 23 okt 2003, at 9:13, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:

	the assumption made in RFC2461 is that the link MTU is constant
	over the link, i guess.  i don't think it is necessary to make
	MTU negotiable between peers, it would complicate too many things.
What would it complicate?

Obviously nobody is going to force anyone to implement such an option; it would only be used between consenting hosts.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.