Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 23 okt 2003, at 9:49, Pekka Savola wrote:

> > 	the assumption made in RFC2461 is that the link MTU is constant
> > 	over the link, i guess.  i don't think it is necessary to make
> > 	MTU negotiable between peers, it would complicate too many things.
> FWIW, I agree with this assumption.  Really, if you want to put 
> different
> MTU's on the same link and want to optimize it, use multiple links..
Could you people be any more dismissive if you tried?

I wish I could sentence you both to three months NOC duty.

See http://sd.wareonearth.com/~phil/net/jumbo/ for some links 
surrounding this issue.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------