Re: RFC 2461- issue list

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>]

I have a high-level question first; is the intent to do these updates
and recycle the document as a draft standard?
Or to try to move it to full standard?

If recycle at draft is the goal, are there documents (such as MIPv6)
which contain extensions to the packet formats which should be folded
into the base ND spec at this point in time?

In addition to the MIP issues in your list there is (at least) the
definition of the R bit in the prefix option, and the advertisement
interval option.

   Erik


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------