Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 23 okt 2003, at 12:12, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > Even if you don't want a separate physical infrastructure, defining a
> > VLAN is trivial.
>
> Yes, and setting up a new TCP session is even more trivial. But somehow
> people see the value of writing a 150 page specification to do
> mobility.
Yes, and...?
You don't set up VLAN's for every session the hosts create. You do it
once and you're done.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.