Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"

[Raul Echeberria <raul@lacnic.net>]

At 08:10 22/10/2003, Brian Haberman wrote:
> This is a IPv6 working group last call for comments on advancing the
> following document as an Proposed Standard:
>
>         Title           : Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses
>         Author(s)       : R. Hinden, B. Haberman
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-01.txt
>         Pages           : 15
>         Date            : 2003-9-24
>
> Please send substantive comments to the ipv6 mailing list, and minor
> editorial comments to the authors.  This last call period will end on 5
> November 2003.

Comments:

- section 3.2 of the document includes recommendations on fees that are not 
appropriated to be included in a Proposed Standard. The document should 
limit to recommend the establishment of a central registry and suggesting a 
fee in a recovery basis fashion.

- section 13.0 is not clear in the requirements under which the IANA should 
design the central authority.

- While my first thought is that unique local IPv6 Unicast Addresses would 
be useful, I have realized that there are still serious doubts on this 
point and the impact of the introduction of them.


Based on these considerations, I think that more discussion on this 
document is necessary.


Regards,

Raul Echeberria
LACNIC



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------