Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"

[Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>]

I think that if you were to drop entirely the randomly self generated 
addresses
and do not say anything about the fee scruture except it has to
be low cost, it would be a much more swallable pill.

   - Alain.


Bob Hinden wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> > After thinking about this and looking at the evident need to make 
> > some progress
> > here I'd like to believe that this level of resolution of potential 
> > ambiguity
> > is adequate, given that there is always the option to use a central 
> > registry draw to
> > obtain a global id that is assuredly unique.
> >
> > My other issues with the current rev of the draft are still on the 
> > table, and of course
> > I'd be happy to work with the authors to come up with some revised 
> > words that may find
> > some reasonable (rough) wg consensus, and still remain within the 
> > overall spirit
> > and intent of this proposal.
>
> Thanks.  That would be very helpful.  I will contact you off list and 
> see if we can get together to come with some wording that could be 
> presented to the w.g. during the Thursday session.
>
> Bob
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------