Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"



At 02:55 PM 11/10/2003, Mark Smith wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:52:46 +0100
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> wrote:

> How about simply calling whatever we end up with "organizational addresses"?
> I think that captures it much better than "local", "site local", "private"
> or whatever.
>

I agree. I think it is a more descriptive name.
As long as the final name doesn't end up being "Hinden/Haberman" I am open to what every name the working group thinks is best :-)

I assume this suggestion means changing the title and text in the document from:
Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses
to:
Unique Organizational IPv6 Unicast Addresses
or:
Organizational IPv6 Unicast Addresses

Bob


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.