Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"
Only nit aside from a flavour of OSI is having to grep for "organi[sz]ational"
in drafts/RFCs.
Most use of "site local" may be in SOHO networks; not sure the word fits
well for home use, but if site local has stigma attached...
Tim
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:54:05PM -0500, Hans Kruse wrote:
> That works for me...
>
> --On Monday, November 10, 2003 21:52 +0100 Brian E Carpenter
> <brc@zurich.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> >How about simply calling whatever we end up with "organizational
> >addresses"? I think that captures it much better than "local", "site
> >local", "private" or whatever.
> >
> > Brian
>
>
>
> Hans Kruse, Associate Professor
> J. Warren McClure School of Communication Systems Management
> Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
> Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701
> 740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.