RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt
Hi all,
> > but then, if we change it to MAY, what is the point in running DAD
> > process? if you do not disable interface (or the address on the
> > interface) the owner of the same address will get confused,
> > peers of the address get confused, you will do bad things to the
> > original owner of the address.
> >
>
> I see disabling the interface and disabling the address on the interface
> as two separate actions.
>
> So, I agree that the interface MAY be disabled.
Agreed. It is Duplicate ADDRESS Detection, so disabling the address is reasonable,
disabling the interface is probably too strong.
John
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.