Keith,
So - yes, we need addresses that can be easily allocated for local use
(and perhaps for other purposes also), but they should not carry with
them any assumptions about the degree of locality or proximity,
trustworthiness, filtering, or policy.
I agree. I think that in documenting addresses allocated for local
use, we should not imply that these addresses have any particular
properties, except that they are intended for local use.
even the word "local" might be too much. it is not out of the question
for networks from all over the world to agree to exchange traffic using
GUPIs and/or PUPIs.
