RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on draft-jinmei-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> so proposed change: the last part should be changed to "the interface
> address SHOULD be disabled". (add "address")
If we say something to this effect (i.e., the address), I believe it
should be a MUST. There is really zero excuse to continue using an
address if DAD fails. On the other hand, there may be some reasons for
continuing to use the interface.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.