Re: SL deprecation draft
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SL deprecation draft
Alain,
Yes, you're correct that we should add that. There was a slight lack of preparation
for the session between me and Christian so this was overlooked, but I
don't think it is contentious.
Brian
Tim Chown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0800, Alain Durand wrote:
> > I just watched the video of the site local deprecation presentation
> > from Christian Huitema.
> > There is one issue raised in the mailing list that Christian did not
> > mention,
> > that is the current deprecation section does not mention the list of
> > RFCs that are impacted.
> >
> > I strongly object to the publication of this document until this is
> > fixed.
>
> I think this would be a sensible thing to do at this stage (not least
> in case there is something being overlooked, although this seems
> exceptionally unlikely).
>
> Tim
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM
NEW ADDRESS <brc@zurich.ibm.com> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.