RE: SL deprecation draft

["Sellers, Julian P" <Julian.Sellers@UNISYS.com>]

(Editorial)

In the suggested paragraph, the urgent matter (revising 3484 and 3513) is presented as following from the less significant matter expressed in the first two sentences.  I would put it like this:

References to site local addresses should be removed as soon as practical from Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) [RFC3484] and from the revision of Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture [RFC3513].  Incidental references to site local addresses should be removed from other IETF documents if and when they are updated.  These documents include [RFC2772, RFC2894, RFC3082, RFC3111, RFC3142, RFC3177].

Julian
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christian Huitema [mailto:huitema@windows.microsoft.com]
>Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:27 AM
>To: Bob Hinden; ipv6@ietf.org
>Cc: Brian E Carpenter
>Subject: RE: SL deprecation draft
>
>
>So, what about a text such as:
>
>Several IETF documents mention site local addresses [RFC2772, RFC2894,
>RFC3082, RFC3111, RFC3142, RFC3177]. These mentions should be 
>removed if
>and when these documents are updated. In particular, the references to
>site local addresses should be removed from the revision of the Default
>Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 [RFC3484] 
>and from the
>revision of the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing
>Architecture [RFC3513].
>
>-- Christian Huitema

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------