RE: SL deprecation draft
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: SL deprecation draft
Hi Eric,
> I have been speaking to different
> companies here in Israel, and the basic answer is that if I
> can not have site locals and NAT then I will not move to IPv6.
If these people are happy with IPv4 NAT, why would they want
to move to IPv6? They couldn't need more address space (net 10
is huge), they obviously don't care about peer-to-peer or
end-to-end connectivity outside their organization, I can't
imagine that they want to deploy any IPv6-only applications
or services...
Margaret
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.