Re: SL deprecation draft

[Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com wrote:
| Hi Eric,
|
|
|>I have been speaking to different
|>companies here in Israel, and the basic answer is that if I
|>can not have site locals and NAT then I will not move to IPv6.
|
|
| If these people are happy with IPv4 NAT, why would they want
| to move to IPv6?  They couldn't need more address space (net 10
| is huge), they obviously don't care about peer-to-peer or
| end-to-end connectivity outside their organization, I can't
| imagine that they want to deploy any IPv6-only applications
| or services...
|
| Margaret
|

Right on.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/u2738Jx8FtbMZncRAqU7AJ44rfIJFVMlpdwVX8xK7/E7ZlZw3gCaAldK
T2stP11svJvYXT2V1tjfVbU=
=e3s8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------