RE: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt

["Christian Huitema" <huitema at windows.microsoft.com>]

> Is it only I that find it odd that talking about Multicast DNS
> is viewed to be in-scope for this document, while talking about the
> applicability issues for the addresses *defined by this document*
> is stated to be out of scope??

I agree with Erik on this point.

> > >    For future study names with Local IPv6 addresses may be
resolved
> > >    inside of the site using dynamic naming systems such as
Multicast
> > >    DNS.
> > >
> > >==> this seems irrelevant and should be removed; above, it already
> > >states someting general about local naming systems.
> >
> > I don't see it doing any harm either.

When in doubt, leave it out. It does not bring anything to the document,
and any non-trivial assertion about operation of the DNS ends up
creating controversies.

-- Christian Huitema


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------