RE: [node req] Should I include points to current set of draft upd ates?

[john.loughney at nokia.com]

Hi Jari,

> I think you should normatively reference only those bis 
> documents that are RFCs, in RFC Editor queue, in IESG review 
> or at least close to it.
> 
> Otherwise it could be a long wait.

Of course.
 
> Informative references for ongoing work are another matter.

This is what I was really asking.  Shall I alert the reader of
the documents which are being updated?

John
1H>þ°¢¹"ž+¢êfj)bž	b²Ø©¿¨žµú+€fŠx¬¶¶­Š÷‘z«ž²Û!¶Úlÿü0ÃXžµú+ƒùšŠYšŸùb²Ø§~�â¦þ