Re: [node req] Should I include points to current set of draft updates?

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at kolumbus.fi>]

john.loughney@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi Jari,
>
>
> > I think you should normatively reference only those bis 
> > documents that are RFCs, in RFC Editor queue, in IESG review 
> > or at least close to it.
> >
> > Otherwise it could be a long wait.
>
> Of course.
>  
> > Informative references for ongoing work are another matter.
>
> This is what I was really asking.  Shall I alert the reader of
> the documents which are being updated?
Why not -- could be useful. To be included, I think they
should be at least in WG draft stage.

--Jari


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------