RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt



Hi Mark,


> >     "Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6 
> >      Resource Records [RFC-3363]. Usage of DNAME Reseource Records in
> >      the reverse tree is deprecated."
> >
> > John 
> 
> 	Just don't mention DNAME at all.  Note DNAME support will
> 	be manditory with DNSSEC so the only issue is whether we
> 	discourage the use under IP6.ARPA which I (and lots of others
> 	in dnsext) now believe we got wrong.
> 
>        "Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6
> 	Resource Records [RFC-3363]."

That would be OK with me. Any other opinions?

John

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.