RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08.txt
Hi Mark,
> > "Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6
> > Resource Records [RFC-3363]. Usage of DNAME Reseource Records in
> > the reverse tree is deprecated."
> >
> > John
>
> Just don't mention DNAME at all. Note DNAME support will
> be manditory with DNSSEC so the only issue is whether we
> discourage the use under IP6.ARPA which I (and lots of others
> in dnsext) now believe we got wrong.
>
> "Those nodes are NOT RECOMMENDED to support the experimental A6
> Resource Records [RFC-3363]."
That would be OK with me. Any other opinions?
John
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.