Re: [psg.com #247] [2461bis issue 247] On-link assumption harmfulfor dual stack nodes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [psg.com #247] [2461bis issue 247] On-link assumption harmfulfor dual stack nodes
Note:
I think you should also point to, using informational reference, to
draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption-00.txt, in the appropriate place in
"CHANGES FROM RFC 2461" -- to give some more background to this.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 rt+ipv6-2461bis@rt.psg.com wrote:
> On-link assumptions in 2461 considered harmful.
> This issue was raised by Alain and documented in:
> draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption-00.txt
> draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault-00.txt
> Also see related issue in section 2.4 of:
> http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/ipv6/draft-jinchoi-ipv6-cRA-00.txt
>
> Suggestion:
>
> Remove on-link assumption from section 5.2.
> This sentence was removed from section 5.2.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.