Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies

["Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey at zoic.org>]

On 2004-02-24, Francis Dupont wrote:
> [Nick 'sharkey' Moore wrote:]
>    
> > Omitting DAD altogether removes the ability to detect and correct
> > address collisions, whereas optimizations such as Optimistic DAD
> > mean that while there may be a short term disruption the problem
> > will be detected and corrected.
>    
> => in the real world this kind of problem cannot be corrected...
> The only thing you can do is to avoid to reproduce the same error again.

Was there a specific non-recoverable scenario you had in mind there?

-----Nick

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------