Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies
In your previous mail you wrote:
> Omitting DAD altogether removes the ability to detect and correct
> address collisions, whereas optimizations such as Optimistic DAD
> mean that while there may be a short term disruption the problem
> will be detected and corrected.
>
> => in the real world this kind of problem cannot be corrected...
> The only thing you can do is to avoid to reproduce the same error again.
That's a rather broad statement to make,
since there may not be L2 address conflicts, and
EUI based v6 addresses may not be used.
=> L2 address conflicts are very uncommon. Personally I never got one.
The usual problem is a config which is copied but not updated,
and the auto-conf does not save you because it is not used for every nodes.
What really matters then is the effect on (the real)
address owner's and configuring node's applications.
=> usually both the real owner and the offender are dead. Murphy's law
makes the real owner an important server.
I think it's worth getting implementors' experience
with address conflicts with DAD, without DAD and with
optimizations.
=> I am an implementor and from time to time a network manager so
I can say that:
- address duplications happen
- at least once DAD saved us from real trouble even the IPv6 network
was very small at this time
So I really believe in the DAD usefulness and if you'd like to remove
or "optimize" DAD on one of my networks my answer will be "NO!".
Regards
Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr
> PS: optimistic DAD is like optimistic russian roulette: look at in the
> chamber after to check it is empty.
That's highly emotive talk which doesn't help the discussion.
=> the optimistic DAD is an old topic now and I believe some of us don't
(didn't? :-) understand our opinion about it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.