RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Request To Advance : "Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM> wrote:
>
> |- Permanent allocation is equivalent of selling address space,
I have only one note on the "unique local ipv6 address" subject:
Organisations wanting "unconnected addressspace" should go to
an existing organisation that they think will outlast them in age
and that already has a LIR allocation allocated. Give them some
money to make them happy and request a /48 from them.
As long as the organisation owning the superblock of that /48
doesn't go belly up you have yourself a globally unique /48.
This is the same idea as getting a 'globally unique domainname'
pay "Example Corp." some money and they will be happy to give
you youruniquedomain.example.com.
I even think that some ISP could see business in this, they
request a prefix from the RIR's and have 200 customers without
problems ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen
iQA/AwUBQDz8jCmqKFIzPnwjEQK5wQCfaP2fsbREkxSUaL+1jwcPPeLwnEYAnRF3
ePDjTIvJzYVunI/YHk7UPxlm
=4ETg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.