Re: Optimistic DAD _again!_

[JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L at C#:H(B <jinmei at isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>]

>>>>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:36:19 +0900, 
>>>>> "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> said:

>> One fundamental question that I remember is whether optimizing DAD
>> really makes much sense while there are other kinds of delays such as
>> random delay (up to 1 second) for the first RS and random delay at
>> routers before responding to an RS.  Without addressing the
>> fundamental question(s), we'd simply restart similar divergent
>> discussions, waisting lots of energy and time without seeing progress.

> So, one draft was proposed to clarify what you indicate and I posted it
> on the IPv6 mailing list.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-park-dna-ipv6dadopt-requirement-02.txt 

Thanks for the pointer, I've read the draft.  Unfortunately, it only
covers the delay for the first RS, and not others (e.g., the delay at
routers before responding to RSs).  I respect the effort of you guys,
but I'd rather want to see a comprehensive scenario before introducing
additional mechanism to solve a part of the entire issues.

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------