Re: SEND/DIID interoperabilility (was: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies)

["Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey at zoic.org>]

On 2004-03-01, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H wrote:
> I don't see the need for any change on this in rfc2462bis.

Okay, no worries, I'm happy too:
I had assumed the DIID behaviour
was widespread. 

>[...]  In this particular case, "A" is a
> CGA identifier, so it cannot equal to a normal EUI-64 identifier.

I had not thought of this! So
it is not a problem at all.

In that case I'm entirely happy
to go with just raising SHOULD
to MUST and deleting the text
explaining DIID.

Sorry to have wasted your time ...

-----Nick

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------