Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention



At 12:56 PM +0200 3/23/04, Jari Arkko wrote:
I think it would be possible to detect loops if we wanted really hard to do that. That might just
lead to reinvention of the spanning tree protocol, though.
This is a danger, yes.
Why is this a danger?

IMO, the ND proxy mechanism effectively does bridging at layer 3. What makes you think it will be any easier here than at layer 2? If layer 3 bridging is something that we need, then why not run STP?

There was some discussion of this general concept (zero-configuration routing and/or layer 3 bridging) in the Zerouter BOF and on the zerouter mailing list... Does anyone know if that effort is still active?

Margaret


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.