Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

[JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L at C#:H(B <jinmei at isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>]

>>>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:46:46 +0900, 
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> said:

>> I also wanted to recall a conversation that taken place at the IPv6 interim
>> meeting about the usefulness of the 'O' bit ... however, if this
>> conversation is out-of-scope to the revision of RFC 2461, that's fine and we
>> can drop it.

> (You meant the revison of RFC 2462?)  I think it is in the scope of
> this work, but do you have a concrete reference to the conversation?
> Which interim meeting are you talking about?  The latest ipv6 interim
> meeting I remember is the one held in Sep/Oct 1999.  I've roughly gone
> through the meeting minutes at 
> http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/minutes/ipng-minutes-Sep99.txt
> but I could not find a discussion relevant to this topic.

Sorry, I was not careful enough: the latest one should be the one in
May/Jun 2001.  I do remember the meeting, but in my poor memory it was
an ngtrans interim meeting (not a joint meeting).  Still, I could not
find a useful reference from the minutes:
http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/minutes/ipng-meeting-may2001.txt

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------