RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags

["Christian Huitema" <huitema at windows.microsoft.com>]

> >> Some people commented that we needed to clarify what's bad with the
(B> >> M/O flags if we want to deprecate (or remove) them.
(B
(BThe normal IETF practice is that when a document progresses from PS do DS and then to standard, parts of the specification that are not actually present in implementations get removed from the spec. As much as I can tell, we don't have much actual implementation of the M/O bits. If we follow the logic of the process, we should remove the corresponding sections from the spec.
(B
(B-- Christian Huitema
(B
(B--------------------------------------------------------------------
(BIETF IPv6 working group mailing list
(Bipv6@ietf.org
(BAdministrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
(B--------------------------------------------------------------------