Re: [rfc2461bis] Receiving a prefix option with prefix length > 64
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rfc2461bis] Receiving a prefix option with prefix length > 64
Jinmei,
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 07:25, JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote:
>
> - the (global) prefix does not start with 000,
> - the A flag is not set, and
> - the L flag is set
>
> Whatever solution we take for this, it won't affect ADDRARCH, since
> it doesn't have any relationship with addressing.
>
> Although I have my own preference on the solution, I don't necessarily
> stick to the idea. However, I'd really like to see a clear consensus
> on this list. If it's different from my preference, it's okay, I'll
> take it.
>
Prefixes of /64 or less in length should be allowed.
Tim Hartrick
Mentat Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.