not-routable prefix for CBIDs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
not-routable prefix for CBIDs
As it seems we won't have enough time I explain here my idea about
a not-routable prefix for CBIDs:
- there are some uses of cryptographically generated identifiers
(the details are not important, they can considered as identifiers
with random bits)
- these identifiers follow the IPv6 address format, mainly in order
to be handled by common APIs
- these identifiers are not addresses so should be very easy to be
recognized as they are, for instance they are not-routable
- IMHO the best is to give them a dedicated prefix in the IPv6
address space
- the only real constraint is the length of the prefix: IANA advice
is 16 bit length
- so my question is how to procedd, possible concerns, etc.
Regards
Francis.Dupont at enst-bretagne.fr
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.