Re: Interface Identifier from Ethernet Address: Inverting U/L bit
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interface Identifier from Ethernet Address: Inverting U/L bit
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Rajan Srivastava wrote:
I could not understand the reason why U/L bit needs to be complemented?
Is it simply to increase readability of overall IPv6 address?
Yes.
(For manually configured addresses, that is.)
It also allows you to specify cool manual addresses like 2001:db8::53
(where the IID is not universal).
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.