Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format?
Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> Tue, 29 March 2005 18:26 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09417 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:26:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DGLX1-0002Sc-Bx for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:33:39 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DGLMY-0005E8-0h; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:22:50 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DGLMW-0005E3-Kd for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:22:48 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09066 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:22:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fysh.org ([83.170.75.51] helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DGLTE-0002I6-Cy for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:29:45 -0500
Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DGLMO-00027Y-00 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:22:40 +0100
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:22:40 +0100
From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20050329182240.GA6565@fysh.org>
References: <200503290220.j2T2KJ8u007856@bright.research.att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200503290220.j2T2KJ8u007856@bright.research.att.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Subject: Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format?
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Bill Fenner wrote: >Any other input? I agree with your analysis: proceed using "_" or some other innocuous character; do not do anything that requires a change to the established URI syntax. I specifically reject the cut&paste argument in favour of using unencoded "%": this is a sufficiently rare situation that convenience really doesn't matter. On the choice of innocuous character I have no strong opinion. "_" seems fine. I note that ";" would be harmonious with existing syntax elsewhere in URIs. Almost any punctuation character looks OK, however. Letters "g" to "z" (either case) are the only technically possible characters that are really bad choices. -zefram -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Zefram
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- RE: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Li, Qing
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? David Malone
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Mukesh.K.Gupta
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? EricLKlein
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- RE: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Gray, Eric
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Perry Lorier
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Pekka Savola
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? kck
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Thomas Narten
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Li, Qing
- RE: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Li, Qing
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: Move forward with scoped literal URI format? Bill Fenner