Re: Anycast support in draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-02.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anycast support in draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-02.txt
On 13 Apr 2005, at 21:06, Rob Austein wrote:
So the criteria here are:
a) Short-lived session (typically two packet UDP exchange, but some
argue that even a fast 7 packet TCP exchange is ok, so long as it's
fast);
For the record, I know of people who have distributed video streaming
services and ftp servers using anycast, with attendant long-held,
million-packet TCP sessions, and who have done so very successfully.
POP3 and SMTP services have been anycast in real, live ISPs' production
networks for a long time (I know of an example that dates back at least
10 years).
As I noted in my reply to Bob, the nature of the protocol is not the
final discriminator here -- it's the protocol *and* the network *and*
the distribution of nodes, and a comprehensive treatment (such as might
be expected if MUST NOTs are showing up in the text) is not going to
fit in this draft.
Another approach is to write a separate document that relaxes the
rules and
describes the issues in more depth than we might want to add here.
This
would keep the current limits in the address architecture (going
forward to
Draft standard) and have the new document start at Proposed standard.
Such a draft already exists in the form of
draft-jabley-v6-anycast-clarify, which tersely defers most commentary
to the grow draft. If there is a use for that draft, then perhaps it
lies in being able to include a normative reference to the grow draft
without holding the v6 architecture document too long in the RFC
editor's queue (waiting for the grow document to be WGLCd and
published).
[...] Anycast is mostly an IP issue, not an IPv6 or IPv4 issue.
That is my view, too, which is why I keep trying to illustrate this v6
discussion with examples of v4 anycast deployment.
Joe
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.