Re: IPv6 WG Consensus call: draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt

[Mark Smith <ipng at 69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>]

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:21:24 -0400
Brian Haberman <brian at innovationslab.net> wrote:

> IPv6 WG,
>       This is a status update on the centrally-allocated ULAs defined in
> draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt.  At this time the chairs believe it
> is prudent to gain operational experience with the locally-assigned
> ULA specification (which is currently in the RFC Editor's Queue)
> before continuing work on the centrally-allocated mechanism.
> 
>       The chairs would like to solicit input from WG members on this
> approach.  Please state your support or disagreement with this
> approach.  Those who disagree, please state rationale for wanting
> to continue this work at this time.
> 

I agree with this approach.

I'd be interested to know if there is a somewhat formal process for
collecting or just documenting the data about this operational
experience. Any (offlist if necessary) pointers or references would be
appreciated.

Regards,
Mark.

-- 

    The Internet's nature is peer to peer.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------