Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete]

[Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>]

  *> 
  *> It probably should, although the title is fairly clear. 1888 now shows as
  *> Historic in the index. But its true update is presumably going to be
  *> draft-gray-rfc1888bis
  *> 
  *>     Brian
  *> 
  *> EricLKlein at SoftHome.net wrote:
  *> > This may seem a little petty, but based on the abstract and title of this
  *> > one, shouldn't the line
  *> > 
  *> >     Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:    None
  *> > 
  *> > 
  *> > be changed from none to 1888?
  *> > 
  *> > Eric
  *> > 


The RFC Editor thought about this, and decided that we could not decide. ;-)
That is, one could argue either way on this.

Bob Braden

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------