Re: [dhcwg] RE: purpose of m/o bit
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] RE: purpose of m/o bit



Isn't it such a long idscussion a proof for the confusion in
understanding the M/O
bits? Instead of leaving the discussion here, thinking that there is
no confusion or
be fore taking any radical changes (either discarding M or O or both flags, or 
making changes to the DHCPv6 protocols), it is better to document the inteded 
use of M/O flags as an informational document, so that we will have uniform 
implementations in th future. I am sure this (intended use of M/O
flags) is very
obvious for some people here, but definitely help many others. Also
this information
will be handy for the implementer.

- Syam

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.