Re: Call for RFC 3041 Implementation Reports

[JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <jinmei at isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>]

>>>>> On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 05:20:25 -0400, 
>>>>> Brian Haberman <brian at innovationslab.net> said:

>       As mentioned during the IPv6 WG meeting, the chairs are soliciting
> implementation reports for IPv6 Privacy Addresses in support of moving  
> the spec
> to Draft Standard.  The following template should be used for submitting
> these implementation reports.  The reports can be sent to the chairs  
> and/or
> the mailing list.

(snip)

>       6. Tested Interoperability by Feature:

>            A. Lifetime Management (Section 3.4)

>            B. DAD Operation (Section 3.2)

I'm not sure what "interoperability" should be reported about
those...as far as I understand, these are only a matter of the host
using RFC3041, and I don't see any "interoperability" issue here.
Could you clarify the required information?

Regarding DAD, which specification should be the base of the report,
RFC3041 or draft-ietf-ipv6-privacy-addrs-v2-04.txt?  (The behavior on
this is very different between these two versions of the spec).

In either case, I suspect "Section 3.2" should actually be "Section
3.3" (more specifically, Step 7 of Section 3.3).  In fact, neither
RFC3041 or privacy-addrs mentions DAD in Section 3.2 as a part of the
protocol specification.


					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei at isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------