Re: address selection and DHCPv6
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address selection and DHCPv6
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:57:58PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Bernie Volz (volz) writes:
> > I would think that how an address is assigned shouldn't enter into this.
> > I can't see that it matters.
>
> It matters only in that different assignment mechanisms have different
> inherent stabilities:
>
> manual: "forever"
>
> DHCPv6: until the lifetime expires and the server refuses to
> renew
>
> stateless: until the network interface hardware is swapped
>
> temporary: "soon"
There's a nice feature on Solaris for tokenised IDs such that you can
specificy manually the host part of an address, e.g. ::53 on a DNS server,
and the full address is formed from the RA information. A colleague
did a similar implementation for Linux. So an address can in principle
be partially manual :)
And DHCP can assign temporary addresses.
Alain sums it up best I think - you can only make a best guess.
--
Tim
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.