RE: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)' to Draft Standard (draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)' to Draft Standard (draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis)
ok, sounds good to me, which means we have no open issues on the draft.
Hesham
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Basavaraj Patil [mailto:basavaraj.patil at nokia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:51 AM
> To: ext JINMEI Tatuya / ¿ 癆 明達哉 ; Soliman, Hesham
> Cc: ipv6 at ietf.org; Thomas Narten
> Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
> (IPv6)' to Draft Standard (draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis)
>
>
> Hesham,
>
> I like Jinmei's proposal of rejecting the issue as far as
> changing 2461bis
> value goes. Because even the Max value of 2999 seconds is
> still not good
> enough for some links.
>
> So I think it is best to let IPv6 over foo specific
> documents specify what
> router configuration variables are modified or over-ridden
> (from the default
> 2461bis).
>
> -Basavaraj
>
>
> On 10/30/06 11:53 PM, "ext JINMEI Tatuya / ¿ 癆 明達哉"
> <jinmei at isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:54:49 -0700,
> >>>>>> "Soliman, Hesham" <hsoliman at qualcomm.com> said:
> >
> >> This issue was discussed some time ago and we didn't
> officially resolve
> >> it on the list.
> >> Basavaraj is suggesting that the hard limit of 1800 seconds is
> >> restrictive to some deployments (cellular) and suggests
> that we increase
> >> it.
> >
> >> Here is how it is currently defined:
> >
> >> MaxRtrAdvInterval
> >> The maximum time allowed between sending
> >> unsolicited multicast Router
> Advertisements from
> >> the interface, in seconds. MUST be
> no less than 4
> >> seconds and no greater than 1800 seconds.
> >
> >> Default: 600 seconds
> >
> >> Realistically there are two possible options to handle this:
> >
> >> 1. Accept the issue: Increase the value of the
> MaxRtrAdvInterval. It
> >> seems that in order to do this in a backward compatible
> way, we can't
> >> increase it beyond 2999 seconds. That's because the
> default value for
> >> the AdvDefaultLifetime is 3 * MaxRtrAdvInterval and it
> must be < 9000
> >> seconds.
> >
> >> 2. Reject the issue.
> >
> > My short answer is I support option 2.
> >
> > I do not necessarily object to raising MaxRtrAdvInterval for some
> > types of links per se, but I think it's outside the scope
> of 2461bis.
> >
> > In general, the goal of 2461bis is (as far as I understand
> it) to fix
> > specification bugs and to clarify confusing points, but this issue
> > does not seem to belong to either of them. Also, I think
> it's risky
> > to raise one particular parameter without understanding the
> > rationale. For example, with max of MaxRtrAdvInterval =
> 1800 and max
> > of AdvDefaultLifetime = 9000, we can allow (about) 4 consecutive
> > losses of RAs in some worst case scenarios. Raising the former
> > without leaving the latter will change this dependency,
> and although
> > this should be a minor difference, I basically don't think we're
> > willing to introduce such a change when recycling a spec at the DS
> > status.
> >
> > BTW, the current specification already allows per-link
> > optimizations/customizations in a different document, e.g.:
> >
> > 6.2.1. Router Configuration Variables
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > The default values for some of the variables listed below may be
> > overridden by specific documents that describe how IPv6
> operates over
> > different link layers. This rule simplifies the
> configuration of
> > Neighbor Discovery over link types with widely
> differing performance
> > characteristics.
> >
> > I believe this issue well falls into this case.
> >
> > In summary, I suggest keeping the current text of 2461bis, and, if
> > necessary, writing a separate document that specifies
> link-specific ND
> > parameters for cellular links (or links with similar properties).
> >
> > JINMEI, Tatuya
> > Communication Platform Lab.
> > Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
> > jinmei at isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.