Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues

To: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn at neville-neil.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
From: Alun Evans <alun at cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:04:17 +0100
Authentication-results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=alun@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: ipv6 at ietf.org, 'Gert Doering' <gert at space.net>, Tony Hain <alh-ietf at tndh.net>
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=503; t=1177664660; x=1178528660; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=alun@cisco.com; z=From:=20Alun=20Evans=20<alun@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20IPv6=20Type=200=20Routing=20Header=20issues |Sender:=20; bh=DHi/Voq7vR+yDzWaCOgbq6Av05oGgmM3TLoGsqvrKbs=; b=MANnB+epwVHZFEryDGOrFdE9U6FFMty4kicOhodcIp+V/aNHGSBmlfws3pcGNg+3InqJjEIx xo9pER+3GkAoG8R7fZ8bSMVw8Wb3jGnsACyktw2zLKnsZOmCWnxmd187;
In-reply-to: <m2ps5qsk1y.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> (George V. Neville-Neil's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:06:01 +0900")
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070425082408.GB73965@Space.Net> <ec091ee63209add27eb5fa7ac883049c@localhost> <20070425101001.GH73965@Space.Net> <CA7D9B4A761066448304A6AFC09ABDA9015AD161@XCH-NE-1V2.ne.nos.boeing.com> <017501c78855$84a6f380$8df4da80$@net> <m2ps5qsk1y.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.2 (usg-unix-v)


On Fri 27 Apr '07 at 02:06 "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn at neville-neil.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>
> I would be interested in a list of cases FOR the Type 0 Routing
> Header.  If there are no good cases for it, it seems to me that
> removing it is the best thing to do.

I quite like traceroute for the return path.

Which would also explain why Hosts are meant to process the routing header.




A.

-- 
Alun Evans
IOS Software Engineer, cisco Systems.
http://www.cisco.com/go/ipv6/

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
  - From: Jeroen Massar

References:
- Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
  - From: Gert Doering
- Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
  - From: Remi Denis-Courmont
- Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
  - From: Gert Doering
- RE: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
  - From: Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
  - From: Tony Hain
- Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
  - From: George V. Neville-Neil

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.