Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-00.txt

[Brian Haberman <brian at innovationslab.net>]

JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote:
> At Thu, 17 May 2007 09:28:10 -0400,
> Brian Haberman <brian at innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
>> While it would be useful to update 3542, I don't think it is necessary.
>>  It is out-of-date given that it says the Type 0 routing header is the
>> only one defined (it isn't).  However, I don't see the benefit of
>> revising that spec *just* for this.
> 
> I agree...
> 
>> Perhaps we should simply add a statement to the errata page for 3542
>> pointing to the deprecation document.
> 
> ...but I don't think the errata page is the right place to note this
> update either, since this is actually not an error of RFC3542 per se.
> (Or can we use the errata page as a placeholder for possible updates
> in the future?)

I agree that it is not an error in 3542, but it is something that needs
fixing in 3542 (along with other items).

In many instances the errata serves as a placeholder for update topics.
 I see no problem with doing that in this instance.

Regards,
Brian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------