RE: [Fwd: Re: [RRG] Re: [RAM] Tunneling overheads and fragmentation]

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin at boeing.com>]

> > From a purely cosmetic standpoint, I think MRU (Max Receive Unit) is a lot 
> > more readable that EMTU_R.
> 
> I agree about the cosmetics, however "EMTU_R" is precisely
> defined in RFC1122 and is used in this document exactly
> per its RFC1122 specification. I couldn't find a similar
> reference for "MRU".

Hmm, I may have spoken too soon; RFC4213 uses the term
MRU, but does not define it precisely. Perhaps this
document should define MRU in terms of how it relates
to RFC1122 EMTU_R, then use the term MRU thereafter?

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin at boeing.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------