RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf
Hi,
I apologize for abusing of this thread but I'm looking for a simple answer (if such thing is possible)
If a network administrator decides to set the M bit meaning that it intends to always manage the address configuration, can he expect all hosts to support the DHCP functionality?
In other words, is DHCP a MUST implement for IPv6 hosts?
Regards
federico
-----Message d'origine-----
De : james woodyatt [mailto:jhw at apple.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 28 septembre 2007 18:43
À : IPV6 Mailing List
Objet : Re: Results: Straw poll: autoconf vs manual conf
On Sep 28, 2007, at 07:01, Alain Durand wrote:
>
> 0% stateless autoconf.
Do you mean there will be router advertisements with M=1 and one or more prefix information options with A=0?
--
james woodyatt <jhw at apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.