Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
On 24 Oct, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
| (cc's trimmed as requested)
|
|
| On 2007-10-23 21:00, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:
| >>>The following thread from ARIN's Public Policy Mailing List is an
| >>>example of what is wrong with the IETF's documentation of IPv6.
| >>I look forward to seeing your draft.
| >
| >Unfortunately, I was not involved in the creation of IPv6, nor did I
| >follow it as RFCs were released and then deprecated, so I don't fully
| >understand it myself. This is a piece of work that needs to be taken on
| >by some of the people who were immersed in the creation of IPv6.
|
| And it has been, in the form of books. I'm not suggesting these
| are the only references, but
|
| Migrating to IPv6 by Marc Blanchet
| IPv6 Essentials by Silvia Hagen
==> See also the native-French-wiki book: http://livre.g6.asso.fr/
(from the Book "IPv6, Theorie et pratique", O'Reilly, 4th Edition).
| are pretty much up to date.
==> so is the book online...
Mohsen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.