Re: AD review of draft-ietf-ipv6-compression-nego-v2

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

James,

> I know of no reason to refer to the old 2023 assignment of 004f.
>   
For the purposes of pointing people to the right spec for implementing
or understanding something, there is no reason to refer to 2023.

For the purposes of knowing which numbers have been allocated, reference
to 2023 might be useful.

Which one is it?

In any case, I'm fine with dropping this reference.

Jari


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------