Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-00.txt

[JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <Jinmei_Tatuya at isc.org>]

At Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:21:06 -0400,
"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant at cisco.com> wrote:

> Erik suggested some new text to us related to bullets 3 and 4 of on-link
> definition in the Terminology section of RFC4861. He is busy this week -
> we are sending this on his behalf. As you know bullet 4 is being debated
> in 6man. Erik thinks even bullet 3 is suspect. We don't want such
> suspect information to be lost in archived emails of 6man. So we added
> the information to our draft. Please see the new paragraph from us:
> 
> 
>                The on-link definition in the Terminology section of
> [RFC4861] 
>                defines the complete list of cases where an address is
> considered on-link.
>                Note, in particular, that Redirect Messages can also
> indicate an address is off-link. 
>                As of the writing of this document, bullets three and
> four of the on-link
>                definition are being debated and may need further
> clarification.
>                Individual address entries can be expired by the Neighbor
> Unreachability 
>                Detection mechanism.
> 
> Please let us know if the new text works for you?

This text works for me (although I guess these new sentences would be
a very good target for the IESG to make a "discuss" comment - good
luck:-).

---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------