Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
- To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu at gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?
- From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:41:20 -0700
- Cc: "Sherman, Kurt T." <ksherman at mitre.org>, IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6 at ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica at juniper.net>, Steve_Eiserman at ao.uscourts.gov, Pasi Eronen <Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com>, "Martin, Cynthia E." <cemartin at mitre.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon at tools.ietf.org, ralph.liguori at disa.mil, night at nist.gov, dougm at nist.gov, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs at tools.ietf.org>
- Delivered-to: ietfarch-ipv6-archive at core3.amsl.com
- Delivered-to: ipv6 at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <48E263AD.3020801 at gmail.com>
- List-archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ipv6>
- List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <48DB374B.1000308 at piuha.net> <0AC4B700F00DBB4C94F95727E0991414014B2441 at IMCSRV7.MITRE.ORG> <48E230D5.3040204 at gmail.com> <0AC4B700F00DBB4C94F95727E0991414014B24D2 at IMCSRV7.MITRE.ORG> <48E263AD.3020801 at gmail.com>
- Sender: ipv6-bounces at ietf.org
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925)
Alex,
I agree with what you said, but I wanted to point out one thing:
In a typical IPv6 ADSL household landscape...
An ADSL IPv6 operational deployment offers a /64 prefix at home.
The DSL Forum recommendations for IPv6 are being worked on. I believe
they are based on the concept of prefix delegation and prefixes shorter
than 64 bits.
I.e., my hope is that in the future you will not be getting a /64 from
your DSL provider.
Jari
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.