Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with M&O bits



On 2008-10-14 20:54, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
...
> I would rather move in the direction where we all implement RFC 5006 and
> DHCPv6 is only used to _register_ addresses that hosts select for
> themselves if central knowledge of which host has which address is desired.

How would that work on sites where the IT department policy is to
pre-assign specific addresses to specific interfaces (i.e. MAC addresses)?
That is very common practice for IPv4 and I don't see it changing
on such sites just because of a change of version number.

    Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6 at ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.